What Is Your Hiring Pattern?

Hand holding magnifying glass over a line of outlines of people with a checkmark over one
AdobeStock
How to make better recruitment decisions by examining your approach: ‘When hiring becomes a series of damage-control moves, the damage starts to feel normal.’

Every hiring decision comes in threes: the version you made last year, the version you’re making today and the one your future self will look back on, either with gratitude or regret.

Most leaders never connect the dots. They keep hiring in the moment, hoping it works out, without stepping back to see the bigger pattern. But the pattern is there. And if you look closely, it explains a lot: high turnover, stagnant growth, missed opportunities and team fatigue.

When you’re down a person and running on fumes, the bar drops. You start asking, “Who can help right now?” instead of, “Who can grow with us long-term?” That might get someone in the chair, but it rarely gets the right one.

The downstream effects can be brutal. Onboarding gets rushed. Expectations get murky. The team adjusts downward because they don’t believe the help will stick. Often, they are right.

When hiring becomes a series of damage-control moves, the damage starts to feel normal. That is not normal. That is just a loop no one has broken yet.

The Thread Behind You: What Your Hiring Past Is Still Costing You

Hiring decisions don’t vanish when the role is filled. They leave a residue on culture, process and morale. You might have hired someone who was not quite ready, but you needed a body in the seat, or you delayed posting the job and watched the workload quietly bury your most dependable person. Perhaps someone great left because they did not see a path forward, and you assumed they just wanted more money.

That past is not just a memory. It is still steers decisions today. So here is a helpful place to start: Take a quiet moment this week and jot down the last five hires you made. Ask yourself why those roles opened, how urgent the hire felt, how the team handled the change and whether the person who filled it met the need. No spreadsheets are needed, just your honest reflection. You’re looking for themes underneath the scramble.

Those themes are telling you something. They might be showing you where you are consistently hiring too late or how often you are choosing speed over longevity. They might even point to positions that have become revolving doors. Once you see the pattern, it becomes easier to stop repeating it.

If the pattern shows you’re caught in reactive cycles, here’s how to break them. Create a simple “hiring heat map” during your annual planning that shows where pressure points will likely emerge over the next 12-18 months. Map out probable departures, growth-driven needs and roles where people are already stretching thin. When you see the real cost of waiting—turnover, training, team burnout—you can allocate budget before the crisis hits.

The Thread You Are Holding: What Your Current Rhythm Is Reinforcing

Hiring decisions under pressure often feel like survival. But what you do under pressure teaches your team what to expect. If they see a revolving door of new faces, rushed onboarding and role confusion, they start to believe instability is just part of the job.

You do not need to overhaul your entire process overnight. But you can start by asking one question: What hiring decisions am I currently delaying, and what is that delay costing me in real time? It might be time, team trust or lost opportunities. Whatever it is, naming the cost out loud brings clarity. And clarity helps you lead.

Start keeping a quiet record of your thoughts. Think of it as an ongoing conversation with your past and future self. But also keep a practical record of your pipeline.

Try the 6-3-1 rule: Always have six people you could call for future roles, three you’ve had substantive conversations within the past year and one you could reach out to next week. Maybe you choose different numbers, but the point is to be deliberate about maintaining relationships so that when the need arises, you’re not starting from zero.

Schedule a 30-minute “talent review” each quarter. Ask the same three questions: Who’s at capacity? Where are skill gaps emerging? What roles will growth require? Make pattern recognition routine rather than crisis-driven.

What were you noticing when the pressure first showed up? What held you back from acting? What would you want to remember the next time the same feeling creeps in? These reflections form a living thread that helps you break old patterns and make wiser decisions. You will be amazed how quickly those notes start showing you what your instinct already knew. You will start to trust your instincts more, and you will start hiring from a place of intention rather than impulse.

The Thread You Have Not Woven Yet: Building for the Day After Tomorrow

It is not easy to plan for a need you have not felt yet. But it gets easier when you pay attention to the soft signals, such as the technician who is skipping lunch because she is covering two territories, the customer service representative who has not taken a vacation in nine months and the department that keeps borrowing help from another.

That is where your future cracks are forming. You do not have to wait for them to break open. Take 10 minutes and sketch out what your team might look like six months from now. Not what you hope it will look like, but what will actually happen if nothing changes. Where will the stress build? Who is carrying too much? What role keeps being pushed off to “someday” that really needs to be addressed now?

Then take one small action. Have a real conversation with someone on your team about what would help them most. Start a short list of people in your network who might be a good fit for that future role, or create a brief profile of what kind of support would help you protect your best people.

Here’s where you can get more systematic. Track leading indicators that predict hiring needs: customer growth rates, project pipeline, overtime hours by department. When these metrics hit certain thresholds, start the hiring conversation before the emergency hits.

For every key role, map out succession possibilities: Who could step up internally? What would they need to develop? Who would backfill them? Sometimes the role you think you need to fill externally is actually two internal moves and one strategic hire.

When you do define new roles, structure them as 70 percent current needs, 30 percent future growth. This forces you to build capability, not just fill gaps. It also helps you identify candidates who can grow with the role rather than just fill it.

The Leadership Thread: You Decide Where It Points

Hiring is ultimately a leadership behavior pattern, not just an action. It tells your team whether you are building something stable or constantly playing catch-up. It shapes the culture more than any policy or value statement ever will.

So pause and ask yourself this: Am I leading my hiring strategy, or is it leading me? Because the truth is, you always have a hiring strategy, even if it is just “wait until it hurts.”

You can change that. Pre-approve yourself for two to three anticipated roles during your annual planning. When pressure hits, you’re executing a decision you made when you had perspective, not scrambling to make one under stress.

You can start building the team your future business will need instead of reacting to what your current business can barely support. And you do not have to do it perfectly. You just have to start steering.

Hiring will always be a thread that runs through your business. The only question is whether you’ll weave it with purpose or let it pull you off course.

Get the StrategicCHRO360 Briefing

Sign up today to get weekly access to the latest issues affecting CHROs in every industry

MORE INSIGHTS